>>1556
Oh, completely forgot about that rule, sorry ^^;
I was thinking perhaps it would've been better to post one with the alternate cover (which I don't have at hand) or just go tagless, yet ultimately didn't bother.
Though now that I think about it, off the top of my head I can't actually think of any explicit covers from good albums; all the explicit covers for good albums I know of are either not technically explicit - nanobikinis on lolis or something - or at worst feature some snippets from a ero-dōjin. All the cover arts I would consider explicit-explicit from albums I know of tend to be a mish mash of 3dpd porno, gore or other shock content, usually on some netlabel shitcore releases, and practically all of them aren't even the good kind of shitcore...
In my opinion, going by specifics, I wouldn't count the original cover art to be gore, seeing as all that can be seen is some reasonably thick blood, but I would agree.
As an off-topic sidenote, personally I like the practise that some boards do where they just ban all 3d content. It creates a nice dichotomy where, for instance in this case, the song with the tagged cover I posted would be b&, however a cover with guro on it would not.